Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 on coding, 71.9 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 1.3x less per output token ($15.00 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Coding
57.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
71.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
47
vs boards won of 47 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Muse Wonder: which to pick

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6, though on 3 benchmarks against 5.

Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($15.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Shared results
47
Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
71
Muse Wonder only
13
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 16.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Sonnet 4.6 45.0% against Muse Wonder 84.0%, 39.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.6 takes 1M tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.6BarsMuse WonderTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work05
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design06
General016
All shared boards047
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
LiveBench coding66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev15231652Muse Wonder
AA Coding Index63.0Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)77.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)55.8%83.1%Muse Wonder
Code migration (Vals AI)39.9%62.5%Muse Wonder
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Wonder measured
SciCode50.1%60.3%Muse Wonder
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
FrontierCode24.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
WeirdML66.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: coding15031522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT14911515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: React15121641Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: HTML15271694Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: from an image1529Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index30.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index152.8161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
AA Agentic Index31.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1213Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1212Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1197Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1226Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1177Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1243Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench research63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench browser68.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agentic23.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.0%56.6%Muse Wonder
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)25.8%36.3%Muse Wonder
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%50.5%Muse Wonder
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)60.2%67.1%Muse Wonder
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
APEX-Agents43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld 2.09.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OSWorld72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$7,204$9,432Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench reasoning86.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI86.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-260.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles16.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert15001513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14931506Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams1306Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1311Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
AIME92.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
OTIS Mock AIME85.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
ProofBench45.0%84.0%Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: math14621486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work14831514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: science14741506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government14701505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance14641483Muse Wonder
FACTS Benchmark Suite37.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites12841362Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components12691379Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev12581376Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz12781317Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D12341427Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories12751371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: SVG1196Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1235Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LiveBench design71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveBench data analysis76.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)62.5%70.2%Muse Wonder
SAGE (Vals AI)46.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
IFBench56.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%80.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench89.9%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA46.5%56.8%Muse Wonder
ExploitBench23.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text14581502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following14761491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing14351491Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision1283Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: English14721507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English14401492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese14911537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1420Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1410Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: French14651523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14401522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1443Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14641510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries14791493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language14441496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14311482Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1307Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1296Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1248Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1195Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1272Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
LMArena Document1482Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Muse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.011Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.195Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.750Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Wonder
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6Meta Muse Wonder
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 17, 2026October 12, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$4.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$20.00
Coding index57.371.9
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved task$1.68Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6, though on 3 benchmarks against 5. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($15.00 vs $20.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Muse Wonder?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.6's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-meta-muse-wonder" title="Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Wonder, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-vs-meta-muse-wonder">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Wonder</a></p>