Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 50.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
34
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 34 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 50.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
34
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
66
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 31.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): Claude Sonnet 4.5 73.2% against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 41.4%, 31.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 50.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge40
General190
All shared boards340
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCodeNot measured33.0%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14881416Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731417Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.77.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1136Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured28.1%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%41.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
MCP Atlas59.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%55.6%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621398Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831397Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711406Claude Sonnet 4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured66.3Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%62.2%Claude Sonnet 4.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14491394Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621411Claude Sonnet 4.5
MathArena12.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.5%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14481393Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441392Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511387Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401389Claude Sonnet 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench Finance43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench Legal40.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites1189Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1157Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1182Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1114Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured50.7%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured61.3%Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBench83.2%67.2%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMCA38.8%22.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text14381384Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591363Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421317Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: English14501391Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251372Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601432Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: German14271379Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13901337Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14021330Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: French14591419Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14581404Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371369Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14231353Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651378Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751378Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421336Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281334Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MultiChallenge55.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025July 29, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.09
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.30
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 50.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next