Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 6.7, and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 15.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
25
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 25 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
25
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
70
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
10
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 39.1 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: entertainment and media: Claude Sonnet 4.5 1428 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 1150, 46.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General110
All shared boards250
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified74.8%47.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14881276Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731261Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.76.7Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7119.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.7%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621251Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831221Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711269Claude Sonnet 4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14491251Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621243Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14481221Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441187Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511257Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401224Claude Sonnet 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1158Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1183Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DTBench83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMCA38.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14381230Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591223Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421174Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: English14501248Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251205Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601222Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: German1427Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1390Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1402Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14371228Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651222Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751251Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421191Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281150Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025November 11, 2024
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.66
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.00
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next