Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 7.7, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 37.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
36
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 36 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
36
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
59
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
17
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 40.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.8% against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 8.1%, 69.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsQwen2.5 72B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Math40
Knowledge40
General180
All shared boards360
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%16.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14881292Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731292Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.77.7Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7129.0Claude Sonnet 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
METR time horizons67.4%35.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
BALROGNot measured16.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured5.7%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured49.1%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%49.1%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured79.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621271Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831245Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711279Claude Sonnet 4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%8.1%Claude Sonnet 4.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%63.2%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: math14491283Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621290Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLUNot measured85.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured94.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14481275Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441258Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511288Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401253Claude Sonnet 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1189Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1170Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1157Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1182Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.9%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
DTBench83.2%62.9%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMCA38.8%13.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
HellaSwagNot measured84.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured82.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQANot measured82.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14381269Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591254Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421221Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: English14501283Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251252Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601273Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: German14271234Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13901180Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14021188Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: French14591280Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14581255Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371264Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651272Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751281Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421247Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281211Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025September 19, 2024
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.36
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.40
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next