Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 20.2, and o3 costs 1.9x less per output token ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 72 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
48
o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
24
vs boards won of 72 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o3: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.16).

Shared results
72
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
23
o3 only
30
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, o3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 15.8 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OSWorld: Claude Sonnet 4.5 62.9% against o3 23.0%, 39.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against o3 $8.00 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, o3 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5Barso3Ties
Coding42
Intelligence20
Agentic work50
Reasoning76
Math43
Knowledge67
Web design41
General165
All shared boards4824
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index42
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured81.3%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench Verified74.8%58.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured36.0%Only o3 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%83.9%o3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.8%Only o3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.1%Only o3 measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%8.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
WeirdML47.7%52.4%o3
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured933.5Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14881407Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731415Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured9.2%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.720.2Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7146.7Claude Sonnet 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1060Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured80.7%Only o3 measured
METR time horizons67.4%65.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%30.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
DeepResearch Bench52.6%45.2%Claude Sonnet 4.5
OSWorld62.9%23.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%63.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured65.9%Only o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index76
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
GPQA Diamond81.6%84.1%o3
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%80.4%o3
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only o3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.1%Only o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%81.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI63.7%60.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI-213.6%6.5%Claude Sonnet 4.5
SimpleBench54.3%53.1%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Chess puzzles10.0%37.0%o3
Mystery game puzzles17.0%29.0%o3
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%52.0%o3
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621402Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831402Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711411Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1220Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1234Only o3 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%67.6%o3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
AIME88.2%85.3%Claude Sonnet 4.5
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.6%Only o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%91.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%84.4%o3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%33.3%o3
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%97.8%o3
LMArena Text: math14491426Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621423Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index67
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
MMLU Pro87.4%85.6%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%83.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%59.7%Claude Sonnet 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%74.6%o3
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%65.7%o3
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%96.1%o3
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%47.3%o3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only o3 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%49.4%o3
GeoBenchNot measured74.0%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: science14481429Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441448o3
LMArena Text: legal and government14511428Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401393Claude Sonnet 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%44.4%o3
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
Design Arena: websites11891036Claude Sonnet 4.5
Design Arena: UI components11701017Claude Sonnet 4.5
Design Arena: game dev11661034Claude Sonnet 4.5
Design Arena: data viz11671200o3
Design Arena: 3D1157Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories11821020Claude Sonnet 4.5
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index165
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%41.8%o3
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%76.7%Claude Sonnet 4.5
IFBenchNot measured71.4%Only o3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured74.7%Only o3 measured
DTBench83.2%84.8%o3
LMCA38.8%39.7%o3
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured88.9%Only o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured83.9%Only o3 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.8%Only o3 measured
LMArena Text14381410Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591368Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421359Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena VisionNot measured1214Only o3 measured
LMArena Text: English14501417Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251401Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601437Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: German14271420Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13901403o3
LMArena Text: Korean14021370Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: French14591430Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14581395Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371406Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14231438o3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651405Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751372Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421372Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281373Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1221Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1237Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1218Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1222Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1210Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1234Only o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1201Only o3 measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
o3$0.0060Fits in one request

o3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
o3$0.124Fits in one request

o3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
o3$0.480Exceeds the context window

o3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o3
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5OpenAI o3
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025April 16, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$8.00
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16$0.571
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than o3 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($8.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.571 against $1.16).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o3?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $1.16 and o3 $0.571.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o3?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o3 comparison based on?

72 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and o3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next