Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o1-pro

Updated October 21, 2026. 2 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
20.7
Output $/M
$15.00
2
o1-proOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
12.4
Output $/M
$600.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

Decision reading

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1-pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
90
o1-pro only
0
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, o1-pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 40.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: Claude Sonnet 4.5 63.7% against o1-pro 23.3%, 40.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against o1-pro $600.00 per million output tokens, 40.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, o1-pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5Barso1-proTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
All shared boards20
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.1Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1488Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1473Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.712.4Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI63.7%23.3%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1471Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1449Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1462Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1444Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1451Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1440Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1158Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1183Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1204Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DTBench83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMCA38.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1438Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1425Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1460Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1427Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1390Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1402Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1459Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1437Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1465Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1475Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1442Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1428Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5o1-proLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
o1-pro$0.450Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
o1-pro$9.30Fits in one request

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
o1-pro$36.00Exceeds the context window

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1-pro
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5OpenAI o1-pro
MakerAnthropicOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025March 19, 2025
Context window1M200K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$150.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$600.00
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than o1-pro for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; o1-pro has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o1-pro?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; o1-pro costs $150.00 and $600.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o1-pro?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o1-pro comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and o1-pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next