Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 187.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
37
Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 187.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
37
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
58
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 60.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.8% against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 1.7%, 76.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 per million output tokens, 187.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5 takes 1M tokens, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5BarsLlama 3.1 8B InstructTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Math40
Knowledge40
General180
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified74.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1394Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index52.15.4Claude Sonnet 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.6%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.8%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench14.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdML47.7%1.7%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Cybench60.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14881195Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14731195Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1399Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.76.9Claude Sonnet 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7116.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index15.8Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1050Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1137Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured16.4%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
METR time horizons67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index2.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPval42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
BALROGNot measured15.1%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
DeepResearch Bench52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorld62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,839Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)73.2%25.8%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond81.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.9%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.3%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%27.0%Claude Sonnet 4.5
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-213.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBench54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles10.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCT39.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621175Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14831144Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14711196Claude Sonnet 4.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
AIME88.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured4.3Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.3%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME77.8%1.7%Claude Sonnet 4.5
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 323.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 597.7%22.9%Claude Sonnet 4.5
GSM8KNot measured82.4%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14491179Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14621180Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro87.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.6%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified30.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMLUNot measured56.1%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14481193Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14441182Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14511206Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14401166Claude Sonnet 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1190Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1173Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1166Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1167Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1158Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1183Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1115Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1205Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured28.6%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured18.0%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
DTBench83.2%50.9%Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMCA38.8%5.4%Claude Sonnet 4.5
PIQANot measured81.2%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14381187Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14591159Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421154Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: English14501218Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14251148Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14601151Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: German14271144Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13901061Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14021053Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: French14591178Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14581169Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14371158Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14651172Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14751181Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14421162Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14281145Claude Sonnet 4.5
LMArena Document1450Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
MakerAnthropicMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025July 23, 2024
Context window1M131K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.05
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.08
Coding index39.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$1.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 187.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next