LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 45 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Coding
66.0
Overall
41.8
Output $/M
$25.00
45
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
50.0
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 45 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 66.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.0 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.

Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when output tokens cost 25.0x less.

Shared results
45
Claude Opus 4.8 only
81
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
7
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.8 66.0 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 50.0 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 50.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Claude Opus 4.8 94.4% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 43.6%, 50.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.8 $25.00 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.00 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.8BarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding80
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design50
General190
All shared boards450
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveBench coding77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena WebDev15561275Claude Opus 4.8
AA Coding Index74.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)23.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
SciCode54.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)58.3%18.9%Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
FrontierCode46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GSO-Bench47.1%4.9%Claude Opus 4.8
WeirdML82.9%41.2%Claude Opus 4.8
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding14901412Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: software and IT14881393Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena WebDev: React15571257Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena WebDev: HTML15431287Claude Opus 4.8
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index41.811.9Claude Opus 4.8
Epoch Capabilities Index159.0Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Agentic Index41.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1233Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1222Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1237Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1231Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1238Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1221Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1227Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench research81.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench browser96.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench long agentic48.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)30.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)11.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.4%43.6%Claude Opus 4.8
APEX-Agents48.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Remote Labor Index8.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
OSWorld 2.020.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DeepResearch Bench50.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
PostTrainBench33.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,787Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Search1204Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench reasoning89.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%61.8%Claude Opus 4.8
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%4.5%Claude Opus 4.8
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI92.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI-272.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SimpleBench64.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Chess puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Mystery game puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EBR-bench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14821372Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: expert15031338Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871380Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision: diagrams1315Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured39.3Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 380.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProofBench69.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: math14861365Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: mathematical work14971367Claude Opus 4.8
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
SimpleQA Verified53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: science14771347Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14641347Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: legal and government14771358Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: business and finance14581343Claude Opus 4.8
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websites12581159Claude Opus 4.8
Design Arena: UI components12561112Claude Opus 4.8
Design Arena: game dev12641099Claude Opus 4.8
Design Arena: data viz12401084Claude Opus 4.8
Design Arena: 3D1223Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: all code categories12551143Claude Opus 4.8
Design Arena: SVG1194Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1276Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveBench design78.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
LiveBench data analysis66.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vals Multimodal Index70.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
IFBench62.2%40.5%Claude Opus 4.8
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%45.7%Claude Opus 4.8
DTBench94.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMCA57.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Surface Evolver Bench87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Furniture assembly42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text14611357Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: instruction following14761355Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: creative writing14541333Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision1294Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: English14681359Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: non-English14501346Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Chinese15061357Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: German14721325Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Japanese14421311Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Korean14311305Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: French14811398Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Spanish14651360Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Russian14741366Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Polish14591344Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: multi-turn14761366Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: longer queries14831378Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: writing and language14611340Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14401317Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision: English1293Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1346Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1303Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1282Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Document1475Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.018Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.325Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.018Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$1.25Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.070Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.8Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 27, 2026July 23, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.00
Coding index66.050.0
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved task$2.17Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 66.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.0 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when output tokens cost 25.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.8 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Claude Opus 4.8, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Opus 4.8's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-qwen3-coder" title="Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-qwen3-coder">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B</a></p>