Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5

Claude Opus 4.7 leads MiMo-V2.5 on coding, 67.5 to 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.5 costs 74.4x less per output token ($0.336 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 70 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Claude Opus 4.7 Replace MiMo-V2.5
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
71.6
Output $/M
$25.00
68
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Coding
50.0
Overall
50.7
Output $/M
$0.336
2
vs boards won of 70 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 or MiMo-V2.5: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.0 for MiMo-V2.5.

Pick MiMo-V2.5 for output tokens 74.4x cheaper ($0.336 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.01 against $2.95).

Model AClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi50.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.01 per solved task
Shared results
70
Claude Opus 4.7 only
33
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 50.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 19.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Opus 4.7 54.0% against MiMo-V2.5 16.0%, 38.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 against MiMo-V2.5 $0.336 per million output tokens, 74.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.7 takes 1M tokens, MiMo-V2.5 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7BarsMiMo-V2.5Ties
Coding120
Intelligence10
Agentic work51
Reasoning90
Math30
Knowledge100
General281
All shared boards682
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index120
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
LMArena WebDev15581438Claude Opus 4.7
AA Coding Index73.656.8Claude Opus 4.7
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.1%81.5%Claude Opus 4.7
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%71.0%Claude Opus 4.7
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)71.0%42.2%Claude Opus 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)43.9%14.2%Claude Opus 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)68.5%60.7%Claude Opus 4.7
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)54.5%41.7%Claude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GSO-Bench44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
WeirdML76.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MirrorCode31.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured514.0Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding15191469Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: software and IT15161463Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: React15601425Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: HTML15541429Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an image1577Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.721.8Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
AA Agentic Index38.615.8Claude Opus 4.7
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.5%36.7%Claude Opus 4.7
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)23.7%7.8%Claude Opus 4.7
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%9.1%Claude Opus 4.7
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.7%55.1%Claude Opus 4.7
τ²-Bench Telecom88.6%90.6%MiMo-V2.5
APEX-Agents49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OSWorld 2.018.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
PostTrainBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2$10,937Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Search1230Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
GPQA Diamond90.2%81.6%Claude Opus 4.7
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.5%80.0%Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.4%84.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.3%27.2%Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI93.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-275.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SimpleBench61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles28.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
EBR-bench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061450Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: expert15211459Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15081461Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: diagrams13361269Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: homework13371262Claude Opus 4.7
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
AIME96.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 370.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProofBench54.0%16.0%Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: math14981436Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work15091451Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
MMLU Pro89.9%82.9%Claude Opus 4.7
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%78.9%Claude Opus 4.7
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%59.9%Claude Opus 4.7
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.3%71.8%Claude Opus 4.7
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.3%59.3%Claude Opus 4.7
MedCode (Vals AI)54.9%31.9%Claude Opus 4.7
SimpleQA Verified51.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science15081440Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14951432Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: legal and government15041425Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance14901432Claude Opus 4.7
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1265Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1255Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1249Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1250Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1215Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1260Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1179Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1140Only MiMo-V2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index281
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)56.1%43.3%Claude Opus 4.7
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%72.2%Claude Opus 4.7
Vals Multimodal Index67.4%52.8%Claude Opus 4.7
IFBench58.6%67.1%MiMo-V2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.7%73.0%Claude Opus 4.7
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMCA52.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Furniture assembly33.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ExploitBench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text14901428Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: instruction following14981435Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing14861393Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision13171247Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: English14961447Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: non-English14801405Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Chinese15311469Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: German14951421Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Japanese14741306Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean14641361Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: French15031448Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Spanish14941414Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Russian14941396Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Polish14891413Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: multi-turn15051445Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries15051445Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: writing and language14921409Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14741399Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: English13221259Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: Chinese13711326Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: reading text13271256Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: humor13091226Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12781189Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: creative writing13261230Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Document1495Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.0094Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5$0.037Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.7Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5
MakerAnthropicXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.168
Output $/Mtok$25.00$0.336
Coding index67.550.0
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved task$2.95$0.01
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.5 for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 50.0 for MiMo-V2.5. Pick MiMo-V2.5 for output tokens 74.4x cheaper ($0.336 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.01 against $2.95).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or MiMo-V2.5?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.168 and $0.336. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $2.95 and MiMo-V2.5 $0.01.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5 comparison based on?

70 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.7's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5" title="Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-5">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5</a></p>