Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7

Claude Opus 4.7 leads MiniMax M2.7 on coding, 67.5 to 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M2.7 costs 20.8x less per output token ($1.20 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 64 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Claude Opus 4.7 Replace MiniMax M2.7
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
71.6
Output $/M
$25.00
62
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
36.2
Overall
44.5
Output $/M
$1.20
1
vs boards won of 64 shared, 1 tied

Claude Opus 4.7 or MiniMax M2.7: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7.

Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 20.8x cheaper ($1.20 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.64 against $2.95).

Model AClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved taskModel BMiniMax M2.7MiniMax36.2/1003 independent benchmarks$0.64 per solved task
Shared results
64
Claude Opus 4.7 only
39
MiniMax M2.7 only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 22.5 points apart on average over 15 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.7 71.0% against MiniMax M2.7 11.9%, 59.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 against MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 per million output tokens, 20.8x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.7 takes 1M tokens, MiniMax M2.7 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7BarsMiniMax M2.7Ties
Coding1401 tie
Intelligence20
Agentic work60
Reasoning60
Math40
Knowledge100
General201
All shared boards6211 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index140
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
LMArena WebDev15581399Claude Opus 4.7
AA Coding Index73.652.6Claude Opus 4.7
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.1%79.9%Claude Opus 4.7
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%73.8%Claude Opus 4.7
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)71.0%11.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)43.9%8.7%Claude Opus 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)68.5%48.7%Claude Opus 4.7
SciCodeNot measured50.1%Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)54.5%39.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Terminal-Bench80.2%45.1%Claude Opus 4.7
FrontierCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GSO-Bench44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
WeirdML76.4%37.0%Claude Opus 4.7
MirrorCode31.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured599.3Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding15191454Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: software and IT15161446Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: React15601388Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: HTML15541401Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an image1577Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.722.8Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8145.8Claude Opus 4.7
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
AA Agentic Index38.615.3Claude Opus 4.7
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.5%27.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)23.7%6.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%10.6%Claude Opus 4.7
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.7%28.4%Claude Opus 4.7
τ²-Bench Telecom88.6%84.8%Claude Opus 4.7
APEX-Agents49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OSWorld 2.018.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
PostTrainBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2$10,937Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Search1230Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
GPQA Diamond90.2%86.6%Claude Opus 4.7
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.4%87.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.3%29.6%Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI93.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-275.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SimpleBench61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles28.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
EBR-bench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061422Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: expert15211443Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15081441Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: diagrams1336Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
AIME96.3%91.0%Claude Opus 4.7
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 370.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProofBench54.0%3.0%Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: math14981421Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work15091437Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
MMLU Pro89.9%80.4%Claude Opus 4.7
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%84.0%Claude Opus 4.7
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.4%60.9%Claude Opus 4.7
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%61.2%Claude Opus 4.7
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.3%66.6%Claude Opus 4.7
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)54.9%34.4%Claude Opus 4.7
SimpleQA Verified51.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science15081416Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14951409Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: legal and government15041403Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance14901407Claude Opus 4.7
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1243Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1209Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1195Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1233Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1137Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1136Only MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index201
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%79.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Vals Multimodal Index67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
IFBench58.6%75.7%MiniMax M2.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.7%78.3%Claude Opus 4.7
DTBench94.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMCA52.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Furniture assembly33.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ExploitBench26.5%13.3%Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text14901405Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: instruction following14981405Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing14861354Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision1317Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: English14961426Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: non-English14801382Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Chinese15311442Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: German14951398Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Japanese14741260Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean14641314Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: French15031424Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Spanish14941402Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Russian14941383Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Polish14891387Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: multi-turn15051412Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries15051418Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: writing and language14921376Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14741360Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: English1322Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1371Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1327Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1309Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1278Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Document1495Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax M2.7
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.7MiniMax M2.7
MakerAnthropicMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2026March 18, 2026
Context window1M205K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.20
Coding index67.536.2
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved task$2.95$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than MiniMax M2.7 for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for coding: it scores 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 36.2 for MiniMax M2.7. Pick MiniMax M2.7 for output tokens 20.8x cheaper ($1.20 vs $25.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.64 against $2.95).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Opus 4.7 costs $2.95 and MiniMax M2.7 $0.64.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or MiniMax M2.7?

Claude Opus 4.7, with 1M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7 comparison based on?

64 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.7's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2.7's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-7" title="Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-7-vs-minimax-minimax-m2-7">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7</a></p>