Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 40.7 to 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs 89.3x less per output token ($0.28 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
71.6
Output $/M
$25.00
37
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.28
3
vs boards won of 40 shared

Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: which to pick

Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a coding score, 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for output tokens 89.3x cheaper ($0.28 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
40
Claude Opus 4.7 only
63
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
9
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 15.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
WeirdML: Claude Opus 4.7 76.4% against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 45.6%, 30.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28 per million output tokens, 89.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.7 takes 1M tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7BarsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Ties
Coding43
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General190
All shared boards373
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index43
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
LMArena WebDev15581582DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
AA Coding Index73.652.0Claude Opus 4.7
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)71.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)54.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierCode38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GSO-Bench44.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
WeirdML76.4%45.6%Claude Opus 4.7
MirrorCode31.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured678.2Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: coding15191457Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: software and IT15161453Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: React15601585DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
LMArena WebDev: HTML15541558DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
LMArena WebDev: from an image1577Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.724.4Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8146.1Claude Opus 4.7
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
AA Agentic Index38.626.3Claude Opus 4.7
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)23.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
APEX-Agents49.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OSWorld 2.018.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
PostTrainBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2$10,937Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Search1230Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
GPQA Diamond90.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI93.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-275.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SimpleBench61.7%46.3%Claude Opus 4.7
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles28.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
EBR-bench19.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15061444Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: expert15211441Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15081449Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: diagrams1336Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%52.2%Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
AIME96.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 370.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 431.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProofBench54.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: math14981426Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work15091432Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
MMLU Pro89.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SimpleQA Verified51.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science15081446Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14951448Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: legal and government15041439Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance14901425Claude Opus 4.7
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1207Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1162Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1196Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1127Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1188Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1205Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1155Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1109Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vals Multimodal Index67.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
IFBench58.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
DTBench94.7%86.4%Claude Opus 4.7
LMCA52.2%35.9%Claude Opus 4.7
Furniture assembly33.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ExploitBench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text14901432Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: instruction following14981421Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing14861403Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision1317Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: English14961441Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: non-English14801419Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Chinese15311463Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: German14951419Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Japanese14741389Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean14641383Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: French15031439Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Spanish14941436Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Russian14941427Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Polish14891436Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: multi-turn15051449Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries15051434Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: writing and language14921410Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14741400Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: English1322Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1371Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1327Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1309Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1278Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1326Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Document1495Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0003Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0078Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.031Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
MakerAnthropicDeepSeek
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2026April 24, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.14
Output $/Mtok$25.00$0.28
Coding index67.5Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved task$2.95Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for coding?

Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a coding score, 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for output tokens 89.3x cheaper ($0.28 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.7's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next