Claude Opus 4.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 22.7x less per output token than Claude Opus 4.5 ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Opus 4.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a coding score, 44.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).
- Shared results
- 28
- Claude Opus 4.5 only
- 80
- Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 29.1.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 85.9%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a AIME result, 95.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B leads, 1250 against 1247.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Claude Opus 4.5 $0.018, Beam 1.0 501B A23B $0.0009 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has the number, $1.37.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Opus 4.5 44.0 from 3 benchmarks, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 7.1 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena WebDev: HTML: Claude Opus 4.5 1510 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1436, 12.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Opus 4.5 $25.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 22.7x apart.
- Context window
- Claude Opus 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.5 | Bars | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 1 | ||
| General | 12 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 26 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench (full test set) | 52.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 70.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1494 | 1437 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 76.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 20.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 47.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 63.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 26.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 63.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Cybench | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1503 | 1473 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1483 | 1461 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1478 | 1443 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1510 | 1436 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 29.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.1 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1159 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1156 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1189 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1176 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| METR time horizons | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Remote Labor Index | 3.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GDPval | 45.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| BALROG | 43.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| OSWorld | 66.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $4,967 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 77.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 30.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 62.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 22.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | 14.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| VPCT | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1476 | 1442 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1487 | 1447 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1482 | 1451 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 95.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 95.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| AA Math Index | 91.3 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 34.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 4.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| ProofBench | 36.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1463 | 1459 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1468 | 1475 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 62.6% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 65.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 95.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 45.7% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| GeoBench | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1454 | 1430 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1444 | 1376 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1459 | 1433 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1448 | 1430 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 43.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1247 | 1250 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1235 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1228 | 1224 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1243 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1213 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1242 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1180 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1190 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 52.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 85.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| IFBench | 58.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 77.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| DTBench | 89.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | 44.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| CL-bench | 21.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 28.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1425 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1478 | 1430 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1445 | 1390 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1461 | 1436 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1438 | 1413 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1470 | 1424 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1449 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1417 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1424 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1471 | 1461 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1457 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1447 | 1412 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1439 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1466 | 1414 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1479 | 1429 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1452 | 1400 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1434 | 1399 | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| LMArena Document | 1462 | Not measured | Only Claude Opus 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Opus 4.5 | Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Reflection |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | November 24, 2025 | October 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $5.00 | $0.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $25.00 | $1.10 |
| Coding index | 44.0 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.37 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?
Only Claude Opus 4.5 has a coding score, 44.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for output tokens 22.7x cheaper ($1.10 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.5 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?
28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.