Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 32B

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Qwen3 32B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 7.3, and Qwen3 32B costs 12.5x less per output token ($0.40 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
28
Qwen3 32BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
40.8
Output $/M
$0.40
2
vs boards won of 30 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 32B: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by OTIS Mock AIME or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Shared results
30
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
65
Qwen3 32B only
15
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3 32B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 20.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): Claude Haiku 4.5 68.7% against Qwen3 32B 48.7%, 20.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Qwen3 32B $0.40 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Qwen3 32B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsQwen3 32BTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning40
Math12
Knowledge40
General140
All shared boards282
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured40.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured54.6%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SciCodeNot measured36.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541357Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14391366Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.97.3Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2138.4Claude Haiku 4.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%48.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured10.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.4%Only Qwen3 32B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%65.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211334Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14431362Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351350Claude Haiku 4.5
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured48.7%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured73.0Only Qwen3 32B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured73.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%66.9%Qwen3 32B
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981399Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301420Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.8%Only Qwen3 32B measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061372Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941368Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14001324Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14001318Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1096Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1071Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1140Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.3%Only Qwen3 32B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3 32B measured
DTBench73.6%67.5%Claude Haiku 4.5
LMCA30.9%17.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured74.2%Only Qwen3 32B measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971340Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14141305Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13711297Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: English14141359Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English13771317Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14181357Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: German13741341Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese1338Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1346Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13811311Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091331Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14271327Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13861298Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691279Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0003Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Qwen3 32B$0.0082Fits in one request

Qwen3 32B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 32B$0.032Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 32B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 32B
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3 32B
MakerAnthropicQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window200K131K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.14
Output $/Mtok$5.00$0.40
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Qwen3 32B for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 32B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 32B for output tokens 12.5x cheaper ($0.40 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by OTIS Mock AIME or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 32B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B costs $0.14 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 32B?

Claude Haiku 4.5, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 32B comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 32B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next