Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 9.2, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 2.5x less per output token ($2.00 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 51 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
22
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
28
vs boards won of 51 shared, 1 tied

Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($2.00 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
51
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
44
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
23
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 11.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME: Claude Haiku 4.5 82.7% against Mistral Medium 3.1 42.3%, 40.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsMistral Medium 3.1Ties
Coding31
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning22
Math31
Knowledge55
Web design341 tie
General415
All shared boards22281 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.920.5Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%44.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured32.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541433Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14391436Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.99.2Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic Index8.01.9Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%63.0%Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211426Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: expert14431408Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351435Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIME82.7%42.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%90.9%Claude Haiku 4.5
AA Math IndexNot measured38.3Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured38.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301412Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index55
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%75.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%62.0%Claude Haiku 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%50.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%70.3%Mistral Medium 3.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%36.5%Claude Haiku 4.5
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%78.2%Claude Haiku 4.5
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061444Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941449Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14001439Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14001418Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websites11221132Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: UI components10971097Tie
Design Arena: game dev10971073Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: data viz11241144Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: 3D10711081Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: all code categories11141120Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: SVG1025992Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: ASCII art1140997Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index415
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured39.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured42.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
DTBench73.6%67.5%Claude Haiku 4.5
LMCA30.9%19.1%Claude Haiku 4.5
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971424Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14141398Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13711391Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14141438Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English13771408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14181447Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: German13741432Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13381379Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Korean13461380Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: French14111460Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14211433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Russian13811411Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Polish13431430Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091418Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14271406Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13861395Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691390Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1179Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Mistral Medium 3.1
MakerAnthropicMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025August 13, 2025
Context window200K131K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$5.00$2.00
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($2.00 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or MMMU Pro (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Claude Haiku 4.5, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?

51 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next