Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiniMax M1

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads MiniMax M1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 11.7, and MiniMax M1 costs 2.3x less per output token ($2.20 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
29
MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax M1: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($2.20 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 200K tokens).

Shared results
29
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
69
MiniMax M1 only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, MiniMax M1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 16.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Claude Haiku 4.5 1443 against MiniMax M1 1317, 21.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against MiniMax M1 $2.20 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, MiniMax M1 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsMiniMax M1Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541359Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14391359Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.911.7Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MCP Atlas40.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211339Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14431317Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351353Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981361Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301363Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061354Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941355Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14001337Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14001319Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1096Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1071Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1140Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DTBench73.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCA30.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971343Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14141312Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13711297Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: English14141363Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English13771319Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14181360Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: German13741350Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13381217Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean13461266Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: French14111370Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14211353Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian13811329Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish13431329Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091335Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14271326Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13861311Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691303Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MultiChallenge50.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
EQ-Bench 41064Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and MiniMax M1
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5MiniMax M1
MakerAnthropicMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025June 17, 2025
Context window200K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$5.00$2.20
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than MiniMax M1 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M1 for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($2.20 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax M1?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs MiniMax M1 comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next