Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Kimi K2 0905 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 15.3, and Kimi K2 0905 costs 2.0x less per output token ($2.50 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
4
Kimi K2 0905Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 0905: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0905 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 0905 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Shared results
4
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
91
Kimi K2 0905 only
13
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Kimi K2 0905 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 8.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
WeirdML: Claude Haiku 4.5 45.4% against Kimi K2 0905 36.7%, 8.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Kimi K2 0905 $2.50 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Kimi K2 0905 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsKimi K2 0905Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Web design20
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.0%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.5%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%36.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
ALE-BenchNot measured267.1Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
LMArena Text: coding1454Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1439Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.915.3Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured73.4%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.4%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1443Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1435Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured52.2%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured57.3Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.3%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1398Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1430Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.9%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1406Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1394Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1400Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1400Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
Design Arena: websites11221088Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1071Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories11141098Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1140Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured41.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured53.0%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
DTBench73.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCA30.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured66.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1414Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1371Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1414Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1377Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1418Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1374Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1338Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1346Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1381Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1409Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1427Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1386Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1369Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Kimi K2 0905Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0905$0.0019Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0905 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0905$0.037Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0905 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2 0905$0.145Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0905 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Kimi K2 0905
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5MoonshotAI Kimi K2 0905
MakerAnthropicMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025September 4, 2025
Context window200K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.60
Output $/Mtok$5.00$2.50
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Kimi K2 0905 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 0905 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 0905 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 0905?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Kimi K2 0905?

Kimi K2 0905, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 0905's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next