Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.6V

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads GLM 4.6V on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 11.2, and GLM 4.6V costs 5.6x less per output token ($0.90 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 21 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
20
GLM 4.6VZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.90
1
vs boards won of 21 shared

Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.6V: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.90 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: Chinese, where it leads.

Shared results
21
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
74
GLM 4.6V only
17
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, GLM 4.6V not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 9.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Claude Haiku 4.5 1443 against GLM 4.6V 1371, 12.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against GLM 4.6V $0.90 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, GLM 4.6V 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsGLM 4.6VTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning30
Knowledge40
General101
All shared boards201
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.1%Only GLM 4.6V measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.4%Only GLM 4.6V measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541389Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14391391Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.911.2Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured31.6%Only GLM 4.6V measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.9%Only GLM 4.6V measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.6%Only GLM 4.6V measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211367Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14431371Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351391Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1182Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1155Only GLM 4.6V measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured85.3Only GLM 4.6V measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only GLM 4.6V measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1398Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1430Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.9%Only GLM 4.6V measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061389Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941389Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14001393Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14001359Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1071Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1114Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1025Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1140Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index101
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured30.1%Only GLM 4.6V measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured48.7%Only GLM 4.6V measured
DTBench73.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCA30.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971376Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14141350Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13711347Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena VisionNot measured1164Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Text: English14141395Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English13771358Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14181425GLM 4.6V
LMArena Text: German1374Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1338Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1346Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian13811339Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091359Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14271357Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13861347Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691343Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1179Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1217Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1171Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1113Only GLM 4.6V measured
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5GLM 4.6VLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
GLM 4.6V$0.0008Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
GLM 4.6V$0.018Fits in one request

GLM 4.6V costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
GLM 4.6V$0.069Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.6V costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.6V
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Z.ai GLM 4.6V
MakerAnthropicZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025December 8, 2025
Context window200K131K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$5.00$0.90
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than GLM 4.6V for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.6V has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.6V for output tokens 5.6x cheaper ($0.90 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: Chinese, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.6V?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; GLM 4.6V costs $0.30 and $0.90. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GLM 4.6V?

Claude Haiku 4.5, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.6V comparison based on?

21 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GLM 4.6V's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next