Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A+

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
16.9
Output $/M
$5.00
Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $5.00 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 3.3x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 3.3x less.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LiveBench coding; Command A+ has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Command A+ not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Command A+ $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Command A+ 192K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index17 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1454Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1439Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.9Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
AA Agentic Index8.0Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
GPQA Diamond72.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1443Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1435Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
AIME82.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1398Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1430Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
MMLU Pro78.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1406Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1394Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1400Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1400Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1100Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1072Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1115Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1026Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1139Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index26 boards measured
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command A+Leader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DTBench73.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCA30.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1414Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1371Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1414Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1377Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1418Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1374Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1338Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1346Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1421Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1381Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1343Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1409Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1427Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1386Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1369Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Command A+$0.019Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Cohere Command A+
MakerAnthropicCohere
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025September 22, 2026
Context window200K192K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$5.00$1.50
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Command A+ for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A+ has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 3.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A+?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Command A+ costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A+?

Claude Haiku 4.5, with 200K tokens against 192K.

Has any benchmark tested both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A+?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LiveBench coding; Command A+ has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next