Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A

Updated October 21, 2026. 48 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
16.9
Output $/M
$5.00
46
Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
2
vs boards won of 48 shared

Decision reading

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 200K tokens, and where what matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI) or MedQA (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
48
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
46
Command A only
12
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks, Command A not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 27.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME: Claude Haiku 4.5 82.7% against Command A 13.3%, 69.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 against Command A $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Command A 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5BarsCommand ATies
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning40
Math40
Knowledge92
General200
All shared boards462
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
SWE-bench Verified66.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual64.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench coding48.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1330Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index43.927.8Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)41.2%35.1%Claude Haiku 4.5
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.6%7.8%Claude Haiku 4.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)43.8%17.6%Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Command A measured
SciCodeNot measured38.5%Only Command A measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.0%Only Command A measured
Terminal-Bench35.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdML45.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541330Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14391336Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1326Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1318Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
AA Intelligence Index16.913.1Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index142.2Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
AA Agentic Index8.01.0Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench research42.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic11.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)31.0%9.0%Claude Haiku 4.5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)22.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured80.7%Only Command A measured
BALROG31.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$459Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
GPQA Diamond72.2%48.5%Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench reasoning61.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.1%Only Command A measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured12.0%Only Command A measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI47.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14211326Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14431296Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351335Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
AIME82.7%13.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)92.2%85.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
AA Math IndexNot measured13.0Only Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.0%Only Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIME66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 596.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13981300Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14301312Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index92
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
MMLU Pro78.7%69.2%Claude Haiku 4.5
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.2%79.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.5%64.5%Command A
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%46.0%Claude Haiku 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.5%61.4%Claude Haiku 4.5
MortgageTax (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)79.6%80.5%Command A
MedCode (Vals AI)32.7%19.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.2%Only Command A measured
SimpleQA Verified13.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14061339Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13941334Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14001348Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14001315Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
Design Arena: websites1122Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1100Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1097Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1124Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1072Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1115Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1026Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1139Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench design59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
LiveBench data analysis59.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)54.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)31.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.2%55.7%Claude Haiku 4.5
Vals Multimodal Index42.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured73.9%Only Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured52.7%Only Command A measured
DTBench73.6%61.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
LMCA30.9%10.3%Claude Haiku 4.5
ExploitBench13.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13971331Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14141309Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13711319Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: English14141344Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English13771313Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14181327Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: German13741342Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13381285Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean13461285Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: French14111351Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14211347Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian13811314Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish13431324Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14091338Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14271334Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13861328Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13691306Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Document1420Not measuredOnly Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Command ALeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request
Command A$0.0075Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request
Command A$0.155Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window
Command A$0.600Fits in one request

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Haiku 4.5 and Command A
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5Cohere Command A
MakerAnthropicCohere
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025March 13, 2025
Context window200K256K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$2.50
Output $/Mtok$5.00$10.00
Coding index35.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved task$0.56$2.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Command A for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where the context window is larger, 256K against 200K tokens, and where what matters is CaseLaw (Vals AI) or MedQA (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A?

Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Command A costs $2.50 and $10.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.56 and Command A $2.69.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Command A?

Command A, with 256K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Command A comparison based on?

48 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Haiku 4.5's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Command A's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next