Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

UI-TARS 7B vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

UI-TARS 7B costs 75.0x less per output token than Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

UI-TARS 7BByteDance
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Coding
39.5
Overall
49.5
Output $/M
$15.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

UI-TARS 7B or Claude Sonnet 4.5: which to pick

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; UI-TARS 7B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 75.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
1
UI-TARS 7B only
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
99
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
UI-TARS 7B not benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 4.5 39.5 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 37.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Kagi LLM Benchmark: UI-TARS 7B 20.7% against Claude Sonnet 4.5 57.9%, 37.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
UI-TARS 7B $0.20 against Claude Sonnet 4.5 $15.00 per million output tokens, 75.0x apart.
Context window
UI-TARS 7B takes 128K tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.5 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryUI-TARS 7BBarsClaude Sonnet 4.5Ties
Reasoning01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured74.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured67.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1394Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.1Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured73.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured46.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured14.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured47.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CybenchNot measured60.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1488Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1473Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1399Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured20.7Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.7Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured15.8Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1060Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1050Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1136Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured67.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured2.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GDPvalNot measured42.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured52.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OSWorldNot measured62.9%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$3,839Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured73.2%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured59.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured81.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured82.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGINot measured63.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured13.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured54.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured10.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
EBR-benchNot measured2.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
VPCTNot measured39.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1462Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1483Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1471Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark20.7%57.9%Claude Sonnet 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
AIMENot measured88.2%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured94.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured77.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured23.9%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured2.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured19.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MATH level 5Not measured97.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1449Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MathArenaNot measured12.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.4%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured62.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured30.7%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1448Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1444Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1451Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1440Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured40.6%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured43.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured40.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1189Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1170Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1166Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1167Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1157Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1182Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1114Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1205Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured36.1%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.5%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
DTBenchNot measured83.2%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMCANot measured38.8%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1459Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1442Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1450Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1425Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1460Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1427Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1390Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1402Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1459Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1458Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1437Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1423Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1465Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1475Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1442Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1428Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1450Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured55.3%Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
BenchmarkUI-TARS 7BClaude Sonnet 4.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0002Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.011Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.0056Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.195Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

UI-TARS 7B$0.022Exceeds the context window
Claude Sonnet 4.5$0.750Fits in one request

UI-TARS 7B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of UI-TARS 7B and Claude Sonnet 4.5
SpecificationByteDance UI-TARS 7BAnthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5
MakerByteDanceAnthropic
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 22, 2025September 29, 2025
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$3.00
Output $/Mtok$0.20$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.5
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is UI-TARS 7B better than Claude Sonnet 4.5 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; UI-TARS 7B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UI-TARS 7B for output tokens 75.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, UI-TARS 7B or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

UI-TARS 7B costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, UI-TARS 7B or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 4.5, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the UI-TARS 7B vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. UI-TARS 7B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 4.5's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next