Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Trinity Large Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.80 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Trinity Large Thinking Replace Claude Haiku 4.5
Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
4
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
Coding
35.6
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$5.00
40
vs boards won of 44 shared

Trinity Large Thinking or Claude Haiku 4.5: which to pick

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.80 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Model ATrinity Large ThinkingArcee AINot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BClaude Haiku 4.5Anthropic35.6/1004 independent benchmarks$0.56 per solved task
Shared results
44
Trinity Large Thinking only
8
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
51
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 14.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: longer queries: Trinity Large Thinking 1318 against Claude Haiku 4.5 1427, 18.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Trinity Large Thinking takes 262K tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsClaude Haiku 4.5Ties
Coding06
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge15
Web design35
General017
All shared boards440
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured66.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured64.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured48.1%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev12381330Claude Haiku 4.5
AA Coding Index25.843.9Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured66.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.4%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured7.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SciCode40.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured45.4%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding13571454Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT13621439Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React12311326Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML12401318Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.816.9Claude Haiku 4.5
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured142.2Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
AA Agentic Index1.08.0Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench researchNot measured42.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured40.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.1%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured31.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured5.9%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured22.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
BALROGNot measured31.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
DeepResearch BenchNot measured45.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$459Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured68.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured72.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured61.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured46.1%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured71.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGINot measured47.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured4.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421421Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: expert13591443Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561435Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
AIMENot measured82.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MATH level 5Not measured96.4%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math13651398Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501430Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured78.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%56.5%Trinity Large Thinking
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%60.6%Claude Haiku 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured67.5%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured13.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science13551406Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491394Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government13451400Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance13291400Claude Haiku 4.5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
Design Arena: websites11371122Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: UI components10421097Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: game dev10781097Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: data viz10981124Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: 3D10811071Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: all code categories11171114Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: SVG10161025Claude Haiku 4.5
Design Arena: ASCII art10411140Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveBench designNot measured59.9%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured59.3%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.2%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured42.9%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
IFBench56.3%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
DTBenchNot measured73.6%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMCANot measured30.9%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
ExploitBenchNot measured13.7%Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
LMArena Text13401397Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following13261414Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13081371Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: English13561414Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English13251377Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese13711418Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: German13561374Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese13121338Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean13061346Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: French13661411Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish13271421Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian13381381Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish13121343Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201409Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries13181427Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13171386Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961369Claude Haiku 4.5
LMArena DocumentNot measured1420Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
BenchmarkTrinity Large ThinkingClaude Haiku 4.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0035Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.065Fits in one request

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.250Exceeds the context window

Trinity Large Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and Claude Haiku 4.5
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingAnthropic Claude Haiku 4.5
MakerArcee AIAnthropic
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026October 15, 2025
Context window262K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.80$5.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked35.6
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding?

Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Trinity Large Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.80 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Trinity Large Thinking, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs Claude Haiku 4.5 comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Claude Haiku 4.5's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next