Nova Pro 1.0 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano leads Nova Pro 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 7.0, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 2.6x less per output token ($1.25 vs $3.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nova Pro 1.0 or GPT-5.4 Nano: which to pick
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
- Shared results
- 36
- Nova Pro 1.0 only
- 6
- GPT-5.4 Nano only
- 49
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano leads, 20.7 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AA Agentic Index result, 16.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a GPQA Diamond result, 77.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AIME result, 88.8%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a MMLU Pro result, 77.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Nova Pro 1.0 has a Design Arena: websites result, 796.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.4 Nano
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano
Nova Pro 1.0 $0.0024, GPT-5.4 Nano $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has the number, $0.14.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 62.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Pro 1.0 14.0% against GPT-5.4 Nano 76.0%, 62.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano 400K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Pro 1.0 | Bars | GPT-5.4 Nano | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 20 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 36 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 56.1 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 84.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 26.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 47.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.1% | 42.4% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 49.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1004.5 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1270 | 1404 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1271 | 1402 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 20.7 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 146.0 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 16.0 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 6.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | 76.0% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 77.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 73.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.9% | 81.7% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.2% | 28.3% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 78.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 51.5% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 5.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 45.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 9.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1246 | 1381 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1211 | 1396 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1259 | 1387 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1210 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1225 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 39.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 88.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 87.8% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 44.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 12.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 5.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | 1405 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1261 | 1409 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 77.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 61.2% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.4% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.0% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 11.7% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MMLU | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1255 | 1374 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1260 | 1369 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1281 | 1368 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1229 | 1366 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 796 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.1% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 47.6% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| IFBench | 38.1% | 75.9% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 21.0% | 76.7% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| DTBench | Not measured | 80.3% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 36.9% | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1372 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1235 | 1362 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1212 | 1315 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1196 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: English | 1276 | 1381 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1233 | 1359 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1244 | 1391 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: German | 1243 | 1368 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1200 | 1343 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | 1321 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: French | 1271 | 1395 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1182 | 1371 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1240 | 1363 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1366 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1246 | 1382 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1255 | 1365 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | 1338 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1210 | 1325 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision: English | 987 | 1202 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1232 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1204 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1161 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1141 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1159 | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | GPT-5.4 Nano | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Pro 1.0 | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | March 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 400K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.80 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $1.25 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 44.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.14 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than GPT-5.4 Nano for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or GPT-5.4 Nano?
Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or GPT-5.4 Nano?
GPT-5.4 Nano, with 400K tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs GPT-5.4 Nano comparison based on?
36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.4 Nano's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.