Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Pro 1.0 vs Claude Opus 4.7

Updated October 21, 2026. 36 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Nova Pro 1.0 Replace Claude Opus 4.7
Nova Pro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
7.0
Output $/M
$3.20
0
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
Coding
67.5
Overall
40.7
Output $/M
$25.00
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Decision reading

Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a coding score, 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 7.8x less.

Model ANova Pro 1.0AmazonNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic67.5/1004 independent benchmarks$2.95 per solved task
Shared results
36
Nova Pro 1.0 only
6
Claude Opus 4.7 only
65
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Claude Opus 4.7 67.5 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 74.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Pro 1.0 14.0% against Claude Opus 4.7 88.6%, 74.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Claude Opus 4.7 $25.00 per million output tokens, 7.8x apart.
Context window
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Claude Opus 4.7 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Pro 1.0BarsClaude Opus 4.7Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1558Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured73.6Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured71.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%54.5%Claude Opus 4.7
Terminal-BenchNot measured80.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured38.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured44.1%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
WeirdMLNot measured76.4%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MirrorCodeNot measured31.1%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding12701519Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: software and IT12711516Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1560Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1554Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1577Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.040.7Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.8Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured38.6Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured23.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured63.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%88.6%Claude Opus 4.7
APEX-AgentsNot measured49.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured18.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
PostTrainBenchNot measured28.6%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$10,937Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1230Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured90.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.9%91.4%Claude Opus 4.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.2%42.3%Claude Opus 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGINot measured93.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured75.8%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured61.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured41.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured28.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
EBR-benchNot measured19.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12461506Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: expert12111521Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12591508Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1336Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1337Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
AIMENot measured96.3%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured97.8%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured70.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured31.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ProofBenchNot measured54.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: math12521498Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: mathematical work12611509Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
MMLU ProNot measured89.9%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.3%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured54.9%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured51.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MMLU82.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12551508Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12601495Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: legal and government12811504Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: business and finance12291490Claude Opus 4.7
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
Design Arena: websites796Not measuredOnly Nova Pro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured56.1%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured67.4%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
IFBench38.1%58.6%Claude Opus 4.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)21.0%78.7%Claude Opus 4.7
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMCANot measured52.2%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured33.3%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
ExploitBenchNot measured26.5%Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text12591490Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: instruction following12351498Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: creative writing12121486Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision9801317Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: English12761496Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: non-English12331480Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Chinese12441531Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: German12431495Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Japanese12001474Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Korean12031464Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: French12711503Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Spanish11821494Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: Russian12401494Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1489Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12461505Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: longer queries12551505Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: writing and language12471492Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12101474Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: English9871322Claude Opus 4.7
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1371Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1327Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1309Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1278Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1326Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1495Only Claude Opus 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
BenchmarkNova Pro 1.0Claude Opus 4.7Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.0024Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$0.018Fits in one request

Nova Pro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.050Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$0.325Fits in one request

Nova Pro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Pro 1.0$0.192Fits in one request
Claude Opus 4.7$1.25Fits in one request

Nova Pro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Pro 1.0 and Claude Opus 4.7
SpecificationAmazon Nova Pro 1.0Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7
MakerAmazonAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024April 16, 2026
Context window300K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.80$5.00
Output $/Mtok$3.20$25.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked67.5
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$2.95
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Claude Opus 4.7 for coding?

Only Claude Opus 4.7 has a coding score, 67.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 7.8x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 and $25.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Claude Opus 4.7?

Claude Opus 4.7, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Claude Opus 4.7 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Claude Opus 4.7's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next