Nova Pro 1.0 vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads Nova Pro 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.9 to 7.0, and Nova Pro 1.0 costs 1.6x less per output token ($3.20 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nova Pro 1.0 or Claude Haiku 4.5: which to pick
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($3.20 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (300K against 200K tokens).
- Shared results
- 29
- Nova Pro 1.0 only
- 13
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 66
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, 16.9 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 8.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 72.2%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a AIME result, 82.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a MMLU Pro result, 78.7%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, 1122 against 796.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Nova Pro 1.0
Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0
Nova Pro 1.0 $0.0024, Claude Haiku 4.5 $0.0035 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has the number, $0.56.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, Claude Haiku 4.5 35.6 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 40.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against Claude Haiku 4.5 1122, 40.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against Claude Haiku 4.5 $5.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Pro 1.0 | Bars | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 16 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 29 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 66.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | Not measured | 64.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 48.1% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1330 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 43.9 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 11.4% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 7.5% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.8% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 35.5% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 45.4% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1270 | 1454 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1271 | 1439 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1326 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1318 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 16.9 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 142.2 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 8.0 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 42.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 40.0% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 11.1% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.0% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 5.9% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 31.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 45.5% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $459 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 68.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 72.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 61.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.1% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.2% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 47.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 4.0% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 8.0% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1246 | 1421 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1211 | 1443 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1259 | 1435 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 82.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 92.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 96.4% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | 1398 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1261 | 1430 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 78.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 81.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 56.5% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.5% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 79.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 13.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MMLU | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1255 | 1406 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1260 | 1394 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1281 | 1400 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1229 | 1400 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 796 | 1122 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1100 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1097 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1124 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1072 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1115 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1026 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1140 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 59.9% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 59.3% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.3% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 31.8% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.2% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 42.9% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| IFBench | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 73.6% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 30.9% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 13.7% | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1397 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1235 | 1414 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1212 | 1371 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision | 980 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1276 | 1414 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1233 | 1377 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1244 | 1418 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1243 | 1374 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1200 | 1338 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | 1346 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1271 | 1411 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1182 | 1421 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1240 | 1381 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1343 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1246 | 1409 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1255 | 1427 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | 1386 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1210 | 1369 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 987 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1420 | Only Claude Haiku 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nova Pro 1.0 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Pro 1.0 | Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | October 15, 2025 |
| Context window | 300K | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.80 | $1.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $5.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 35.6 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.56 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than Claude Haiku 4.5 for coding?
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 has a coding score, 35.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Pro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Pro 1.0 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($3.20 vs $5.00 per million) and a larger context window (300K against 200K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Haiku 4.5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Nova Pro 1.0, with 300K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs Claude Haiku 4.5 comparison based on?
29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Claude Haiku 4.5's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.