Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Lite 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash leads Nova Lite 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.6 to 6.7, and Nova Lite 1.0 costs 37.5x less per output token ($0.24 vs $9.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.24
0
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
Coding
39.8
Overall
63.8
Output $/M
$9.00
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Nova Lite 1.0 or Gemini 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.24 vs $9.00 per million).

Shared results
36
Nova Lite 1.0 only
5
Gemini 3.5 Flash only
76
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash 39.8 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 78.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Lite 1.0 17.5% against Gemini 3.5 Flash 95.6%, 78.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against Gemini 3.5 Flash $9.00 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
Context window
Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Lite 1.0BarsGemini 3.5 FlashTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1499Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured52.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)16.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%46.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
WeirdMLNot measured62.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured911.0Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding12391493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT12411494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1495Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1522Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1504Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured12.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.733.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1202Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1174Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1098Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1180Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1142Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1179Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured63.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured5.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.5%95.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-AgentsNot measured27.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,396Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%92.2%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%42.7%Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured92.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured72.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured76.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
EBR-benchNot measured4.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: expert12011495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12261483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1330Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured62.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured31.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math12271504Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work12351495Gemini 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured66.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MMLU77.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12321495Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12131483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12381488Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance12191467Gemini 3.5 Flash
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured63.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1268Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1273Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1263Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1236Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1244Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1266Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1254Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured62.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
IFBench34.1%76.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)19.0%74.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMCANot measured47.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured58.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text12291482Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following12051467Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing11971470Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision9901308Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: English12431481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English12081475Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese12251527Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: German12291494Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese11531486Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean11531448Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: French12381490Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish12261480Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian12161493Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1516Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11991481Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries12341483Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language12111478Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11761459Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: English9991305Gemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1377Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1317Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1321Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1301Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1463Only Gemini 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Gemini 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.0060Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.102Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash$0.390Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Lite 1.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash
SpecificationAmazon Nova Lite 1.0Google Gemini 3.5 Flash
MakerAmazonGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024May 19, 2026
Context window300K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.06$1.50
Output $/Mtok$0.24$9.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.8
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.21
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a coding score, 39.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Lite 1.0 for output tokens 37.5x cheaper ($0.24 vs $9.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50 and $9.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next