Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Lite 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5

Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Lite 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$0.24
0
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
Coding
57.7
Overall
38.2
Output $/M
$10.00
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Decision reading

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Lite 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 41.7x less.

Shared results
33
Nova Lite 1.0 only
8
Claude Sonnet 5 only
87
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Lite 1.0 not benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 5 57.7 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 42.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nova Lite 1.0 19.0% against Claude Sonnet 5 82.0%, 63.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Lite 1.0 $0.24 against Claude Sonnet 5 $10.00 per million output tokens, 41.7x apart.
Context window
Nova Lite 1.0 takes 300K tokens, Claude Sonnet 5 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Lite 1.0BarsClaude Sonnet 5Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General019
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured74.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1540Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured81.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)16.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured54.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured42.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GSO-BenchNot measured37.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured68.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1463.1Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding12391483Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: software and IT12411474Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1541Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1527Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.738.2Claude Sonnet 5
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.9Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.6Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1245Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1249Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1215Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1231Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1225Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1227Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1218Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1216Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1002Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured82.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured72.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured39.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.4%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured66.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured5.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom17.5%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,378Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)43.3%91.1%Claude Sonnet 5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%41.3%Claude Sonnet 5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured60.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured45.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured35.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201461Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: expert12011489Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12261464Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1293Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1311Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
AA Math Index7.0Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured94.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured65.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured29.3%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
ProofBenchNot measured77.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: math12271467Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: mathematical work12351481Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured33.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MMLU77.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science12321460Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12131442Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: legal and government12381454Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: business and finance12191436Claude Sonnet 5
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1274Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1280Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1278Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1251Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1261Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1193Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1207Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured71.7%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured48.9%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured68.8%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
IFBench34.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Lite 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)19.0%82.0%Claude Sonnet 5
DTBenchNot measured92.5%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMCANot measured50.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured60.0%Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text12291442Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: instruction following12051452Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: creative writing11971416Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision9901273Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: English12431450Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: non-English12081431Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Chinese12251478Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: German12291442Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Japanese11531422Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Korean11531412Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: French12381463Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Spanish12261438Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: Russian12161450Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1425Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11991453Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: longer queries12341462Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: writing and language12111436Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11761411Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: English9991275Claude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1331Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1246Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1466Only Claude Sonnet 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
BenchmarkNova Lite 1.0Claude Sonnet 5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0002Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.0070Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.0037Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.130Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Lite 1.0$0.014Fits in one request
Claude Sonnet 5$0.500Fits in one request

Nova Lite 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Lite 1.0 and Claude Sonnet 5
SpecificationAmazon Nova Lite 1.0Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5
MakerAmazonAnthropic
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024June 30, 2026
Context window300K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.06$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.24$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.7
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.87
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Lite 1.0 better than Claude Sonnet 5 for coding?

Only Claude Sonnet 5 has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Lite 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Lite 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 41.7x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Lite 1.0 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Nova Lite 1.0 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Lite 1.0 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Sonnet 5, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Lite 1.0 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Lite 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 5's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next