Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Nova 2 Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 13.4, and Nova 2 Lite costs 1.7x less per output token ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
30
vs boards won of 30 shared

Nova 2 Lite or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
30
Nova 2 Lite only
1
Muse Spark 1.1 only
66
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 28.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Nova 2 Lite 23.0 against Muse Spark 1.1 71.3, 48.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards030
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index23.071.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding13851498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13941498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index13.433.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.1Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1195Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1042Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert13591478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13851480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: math13591482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: science13821484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13861479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13591481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13691470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1289Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1268Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1235Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1271Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text13621478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13351457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12921435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13851478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13371471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese13641515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German13431469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12731450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12811459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French13811492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish13751464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian13421482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish13271499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13351462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13181448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13091438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerAmazonMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.50$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($2.50 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Muse Spark 1.1?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next