Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
13.4
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
22.2
Output $/M
$2.50
31
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
31
Nova 2 Lite only
0
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
52
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 16.6 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Nova 2 Lite 23.0 against Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.3, 26.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $2.50 per million output tokens.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsGemini 3.5 Flash LiteTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards031
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1435Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
AA Coding Index23.049.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured37.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured6.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCodeNot measured41.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench236.3765.3Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: coding13851453Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: software and IT13941451Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1408Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1448Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.422.2Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured144.9Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured14.3Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured43.2%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured29.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured83.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGINot measured53.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured10.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured19.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13641441Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: expert13591434Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13851440Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1284Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1291Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured71.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured26.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured0.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBenchNot measured13.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: math13591434Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691433Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.7%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: science13821451Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13861438Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: legal and government13591431Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: business and finance13691423Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured51.8%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.3%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured76.0%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
DTBenchNot measured83.5%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text13621435Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: instruction following13351419Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: creative writing12921421Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena VisionNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: English13851438Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: non-English13371427Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Chinese13641468Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: German13431454Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Japanese12731426Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean12811407Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: French13811451Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Spanish13751441Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Russian13421443Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish13271437Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381445Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries13351435Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: writing and language13181428Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13091414Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1280Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1287Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteGemini 3.5 Flash LiteLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request

Same cost

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
MakerAmazonGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025July 21, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked49.0
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.41
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for coding?

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has a coding score, 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next