Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Step 3.7 Flash vs Hy4 preview

Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.0x less per output token than Hy4 preview ($1.15 vs $2.2509 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.15
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.2509
vs $1.15 vs $2.2509 per 1M output tokens. Step 3.7 Flash is 2.0x cheaper.

Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.15 vs $2.2509 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 3.7 Flash has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 against Hy4 preview $2.2509 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Step 3.7 Flash takes 262K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1631Only Hy4 preview measured
AA Coding Index39.6Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Hy4 preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
SciCode43.9%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
ALE-Bench694.1Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1653Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1620Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index19.5Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)21.4%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1179Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1158Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1172Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1129Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1182Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1085Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1152Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
General benchmarks for Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkStep 3.7 FlashHy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench67.3%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.7%Not measuredOnly Step 3.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0019Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.044Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.173Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview
SpecificationStepFun Step 3.7 FlashTencent Hy4 preview
MakerStepFunTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.7506
Output $/Mtok$1.15$2.2509
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Step 3.7 Flash better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Step 3.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.7 Flash for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($1.15 vs $2.2509 per million).

Which is cheaper, Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?

Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.15 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.7506 and $2.2509. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Step 3.7 Flash or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Step 3.7 Flash and Hy4 preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 3.7 Flash has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next