Qwen3.8 27B vs Solar Pro 3
Qwen3.8 27B leads Solar Pro 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 costs 4.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.55 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen3.8 27B or Solar Pro 3: which to pick
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Solar Pro 3 for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.55 per million).
- Shared results
- 7
- Qwen3.8 27B only
- 78
- Solar Pro 3 only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B leads, 33.7 against 7.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B leads, 45.8 against 1.4.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a GPQA Diamond result, 88.9%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a MMLU Pro result, 84.3%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B takes 1M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3
Qwen3.8 27B $0.0017, Solar Pro 3 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.8 27B has the number, $1.26.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3.8 27B 74.2 from 4 benchmarks, Solar Pro 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 49.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- AA Coding Index: Qwen3.8 27B 68.1 against Solar Pro 3 16.2, 51.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen3.8 27B $2.55 against Solar Pro 3 $0.60 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3.8 27B takes 1M tokens, Solar Pro 3 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen3.8 27B | Bars | Solar Pro 3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 86.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1593 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| AA Coding Index | 68.1 | 16.2 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 64.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 14.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 39.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 58.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 67.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SciCode | 46.6% | 25.5% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 7.6% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1483 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1478 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1602 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1570 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1577 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 33.7 | 7.8 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.7 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 45.8 | 1.4 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| LiveBench research | 59.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveBench browser | 32.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 27.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 48.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 30.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 36.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 59.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 86.3% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 47.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 80.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 90.5% | 72.4% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.9% | 10.3% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| ARC-AGI | 87.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 42.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1459 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1479 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1461 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1285 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1295 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1455 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1458 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 84.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 70.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 64.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 28.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1467 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1437 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1447 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1438 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench design | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 52.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 83.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Solar Pro 3 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 82.0% | 32.3% | Qwen3.8 27B |
| DTBench | 88.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMCA | 41.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 45.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1440 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1436 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1383 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1269 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1448 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1428 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1501 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1443 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1387 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1384 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1465 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1449 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1415 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1439 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1440 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1448 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1405 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1393 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1267 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1326 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1281 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1235 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1237 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.8 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.8 27B | Solar Pro 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 27B | Upstage Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Upstage |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 14, 2026 | January 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.425 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.55 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | 74.2 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 4 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.26 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3.8 27B better than Solar Pro 3 for coding?
Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Solar Pro 3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Solar Pro 3 for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.55 per million).
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Solar Pro 3?
Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.425 per million input tokens and $2.55 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 27B only.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Solar Pro 3?
Qwen3.8 27B, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 27B vs Solar Pro 3 comparison based on?
7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.8 27B's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.