Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3.8 27B leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.9, and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.70 vs $2.55 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.8 27BQwen
Coding
74.2
Overall
59.6
Output $/M
$2.55
3
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.70
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct: which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.70 vs $2.55 per million).

Shared results
3
Qwen3.8 27B only
82
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct only
7
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 27B 74.2 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 25.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Qwen3.8 27B 33.7 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 7.9, 25.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.8 27B $2.55 against Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct $0.70 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 27B takes 1M tokens, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.8 27BBarsQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding86.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev1593Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
AA Coding Index68.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Code migration (Vals AI)14.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
IOI (Vals AI)39.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)58.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured69.7%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
SciCode46.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.1%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1483Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1602Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1570Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1577Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.77.9Qwen3.8 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index151.7Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index45.8Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench research59.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench browser32.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)30.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)36.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured19.9%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents47.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond88.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench reasoning80.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.5%72.0%Qwen3.8 27B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)33.9%8.9%Qwen3.8 27B
ARC-AGI87.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
ARC-AGI-242.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1459Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1479Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1461Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1285Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured82.3Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.3%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
ProofBench16.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: math1455Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1458Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedCode (Vals AI)28.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.7%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1467Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1447Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1438Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
LiveBench design75.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
SAGE (Vals AI)52.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
IFBenchNot measured45.1%Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
DTBench88.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMCA41.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Surface Evolver Bench45.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text1440Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1436Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1383Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: English1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1428Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1501Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: German1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1387Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: French1465Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1449Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1439Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1440Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1448Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1405Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1393Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: English1267Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1326Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1281Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B$0.0017Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B$0.029Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 27B$0.111Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct$0.047Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationQwen3.8 27BQwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 14, 2026October 6, 2025
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.425$0.20
Output $/Mtok$2.55$0.70
Coding index74.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved task$1.26Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 27B better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.70 vs $2.55 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.425 per million input tokens and $2.55 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20 and $0.70. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 27B only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3.8 27B, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.8 27B's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next