Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Hy3 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 35 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen3.6 PlusQwen
Coding
37.4
Overall
27.0
Output $/M
$1.95
33
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
22.4
Overall
25.3
Output $/M
$0.60
1
vs boards won of 35 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus for coding: it scores 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview.

Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 3.3x less, or when the benchmark that matters is AA Coding Index, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Qwen3.6 Plus only
48
Hy3 preview only
1
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.6 Plus 37.4 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 preview 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 11.2 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: Qwen3.6 Plus 1463 against Hy3 preview 1356, 17.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.6 Plus $1.95 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.6 Plus takes 1M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.6 PlusBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding61
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning401 tie
Math20
Knowledge40
General150
All shared boards3311 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index61
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev14611357Qwen3.6 Plus
AA Coding Index54.558.8Hy3 preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)25.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%34.1%Qwen3.6 Plus
ALE-Bench670.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: coding14671421Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14621423Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: React14541349Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: HTML14631356Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: from an image1472Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index27.025.3Qwen3.6 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index147.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)14.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)32.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%92.7%Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2$5,115Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond87.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)84.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)88.2%86.7%Qwen3.6 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%27.8%Tie
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481413Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14541422Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14551416Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
AIME94.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 338.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14491424Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14481442Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro87.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedCode (Vals AI)36.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SimpleQA Verified44.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science14391416Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14421405Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14371430Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance14301397Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1243Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI components1233Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: game dev1211Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: data viz1228Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3D1202Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categories1236Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVG1160Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1115Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index150
General benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)44.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal Index51.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
IFBench75.2%63.1%Qwen3.6 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%64.7%Qwen3.6 Plus
DTBench81.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMCA33.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CL-bench20.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text14361401Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14241383Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing14041339Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: English14451409Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14241390Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14771435Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: German1451Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean1379Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: French14551425Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14321399Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14341399Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish1433Not measuredOnly Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14381411Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14391402Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language14181370Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14021352Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3.6 PlusHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.6 Plus$0.0013Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.6 Plus$0.022Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.6 Plus$0.085Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.6 Plus and Hy3 preview
SpecificationQwen3.6 PlusTencent Hy3 preview
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 2, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.325$0.18
Output $/Mtok$1.95$0.60
Coding index37.422.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Pick Qwen3.6 Plus for coding: it scores 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.4 for Hy3 preview. Pick Hy3 preview when output tokens cost 3.3x less, or when the benchmark that matters is AA Coding Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.325 per million input tokens and $1.95 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 Plus only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6 Plus or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3.6 Plus, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.6 Plus vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.6 Plus's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next