Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Qwen3.5-Flash on coding, 61.1 to 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5-Flash costs 10.4x less per output token ($0.26 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-FlashQwen
Coding
41.1
Overall
50.1
Output $/M
$0.26
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
28
vs boards won of 28 shared

Qwen3.5-Flash or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 10.4x cheaper ($0.26 vs $2.70 per million).

Shared results
28
Qwen3.5-Flash only
27
Step 5 Preview only
33
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-Flash 41.1 from 2 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 34.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Qwen3.5-Flash 1229 against Step 5 Preview 1583, 58.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-Flash $0.26 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-Flash takes 1M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-FlashBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding05
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General014
All shared boards028
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev12441567Step 5 Preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
ALE-Bench265.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14121485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14161473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: React12291583Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML12911556Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured43.7Only Step 5 Preview measured
Epoch Capabilities Index143.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond82.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles20.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14031461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14071485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14091454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
AIME92.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 318.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: math14071458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14131460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro84.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)56.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)33.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified20.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14151454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14071439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13981437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13941435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index014
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured88.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
DTBench82.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text13971440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13741438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13431409Step 5 Preview
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: English14041447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13851428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14451500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13691383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1344Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: French14131438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14001441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13801433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1376Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13931437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13921449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13691425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13471412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0002Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0040Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-Flash$0.016Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-Flash and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationQwen3.5-FlashStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.065$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.26$2.70
Coding index41.161.1
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.40Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 41.1 for Qwen3.5-Flash. Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for output tokens 10.4x cheaper ($0.26 vs $2.70 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.065 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5-Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-Flash or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-Flash vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/qwen3-5-flash-02-23-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="Qwen3.5-Flash vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/qwen3-5-flash-02-23-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Qwen3.5-Flash vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>