Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.0 to 7.7, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 2.3x less per output token ($0.40 vs $0.9152 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
Coding
31.6
Overall
39.3
Output $/M
$0.9152
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a coding score, 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.9152 per million).

Shared results
35
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
18
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
35
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 31.6 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 59.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 34.5% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 94.2%, 59.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.9152 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct takes 33K tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 72B InstructBarsMiMo-V2.5-ProTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General019
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1480Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.2Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.3%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured57.3%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)27.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured50.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%43.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
WeirdML16.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured899.8Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LMArena Text: coding12921501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: software and IT12921495MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1469Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1473Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.726.0MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index129.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.3Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.9%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.2%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%94.2%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
METR time horizons35.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROG16.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany5.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured82.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.1%86.6%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%35.7%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12711486MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: expert12451501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12791494MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME8.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured22.0%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
MATH level 563.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12831481MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: mathematical work12901491MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.5%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)72.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
MMLU85.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge94.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12751482MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12581473MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government12881474MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: business and finance12531466MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1266Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1246Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1261Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1257Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1243Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1265Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1181Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1156Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.7%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
IFBench36.9%79.9%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.7%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
DTBench62.9%84.5%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMCA13.4%29.5%MiMo-V2.5-Pro
HellaSwag84.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrande82.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQA82.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12691464MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following12541475MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing12211438MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: English12831477MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: non-English12521448MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese12731507MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: German12341459MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Japanese11801410MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Korean11881435MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: French12801487MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Spanish12551469MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Russian12641449MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1464Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12721476MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: longer queries12811481MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language12471451MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12111438MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructMiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.026Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SpecificationQwen2.5 72B InstructXiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MakerQwenXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 19, 2024April 22, 2026
Context window33K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.36$0.4575
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.9152
Coding indexNot benchmarked31.6
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.03
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a coding score, 31.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.9152 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.4575 and $0.9152. Cost per solved task is known for MiMo-V2.5-Pro only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next