Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on coding, 33.2 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.9x less per output token ($1.28 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 58 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Nemotron 3 Ultra Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
10
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
54.0
Output $/M
$1.28
48
vs boards won of 58 shared

Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for coding: it scores 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for work measured by FrontierCode or AA Agentic Index, where it leads.

Model ANemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA30.0/1003 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
58
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
13
Qwen3.7 Plus only
17
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 14.3 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Nemotron 3 Ultra 7.6% against Qwen3.7 Plus 46.4%, 38.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Ultra takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding18
Intelligence02
Agentic work14
Reasoning25
Math03
Knowledge22
Web design08
General416
All shared boards1048
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Coding Index49.355.9Qwen3.7 Plus
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)7.6%46.4%Qwen3.7 Plus
Code migration (Vals AI)4.9%12.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.9%52.8%Qwen3.7 Plus
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode40.3%46.1%Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)36.4%47.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode13.6%10.2%Nemotron 3 Ultra
WeirdML43.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: coding14681473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14681473Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.925.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0147.0Qwen3.7 Plus
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index20.117.5Nemotron 3 Ultra
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%38.2%Qwen3.7 Plus
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured10.5%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%16.4%Qwen3.7 Plus
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)31.7%49.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%93.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents22.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
MCP Atlas63.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond86.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.7%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.4%35.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.4%87.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
Mystery game puzzles20.0%17.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: hard prompts14521460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14721466Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14531460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1292Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%93.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured34.4%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
ProofBench2.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: math14571467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14611470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: science14651464Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14561464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14521451Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: business and finance14341435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites11451269Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: UI components11351258Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: game dev11381262Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: data viz11411277Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: 3D11311238Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: all code categories11461268Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: SVG10691207Qwen3.7 Plus
Design Arena: ASCII art11001143Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index416
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured53.9%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
IFBench81.4%78.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%73.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBench90.1%84.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMCA36.9%37.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14451454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14181439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing13991438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: English14551458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14271445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14971509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German14721471Nemotron 3 Ultra
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1412Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean13841413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French14721472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14551457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14171457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish13851449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14111459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14371454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language14061437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13971422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1332Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1288Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1258Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 Plus
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJune 4, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.32
Output $/Mtok$2.40$1.28
Coding index30.033.2
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for coding: it scores 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for work measured by FrontierCode or AA Agentic Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

58 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Ultra's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>