LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Updated October 21, 2026. 16 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
57.8
Overall
29.2
Output $/M
$1.20
12
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
65.5
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.50
4
vs boards won of 16 shared

Decision reading

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.8 for MiniMax M3, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick MiniMax M3 when what matters is LiveBench coding or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
16
MiniMax M3 only
100
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M3 57.8 from 2 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 12.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): MiniMax M3 83.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 14.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M3 $1.20 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M3BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding11
Intelligence10
Agentic work12
Reasoning11
Web design60
General20
All shared boards124
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench coding70.9%65.5%MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev1482Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index58.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)47.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)33.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)9.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SciCode47.1%47.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
FrontierCode14.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-Bench640.0Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1466Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1478Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1455Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1470Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.226.5MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index146.9Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Agentic Index29.5Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1200Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1169Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1164Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1180Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1205Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1021Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench research68.0%70.9%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LiveBench browser8.0%4.0%MiniMax M3
LiveBench long agentic12.4%15.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)20.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)29.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)47.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom88.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
APEX-Agents37.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$2,158Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
GPQA Diamond92.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoning74.5%78.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)81.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%30.7%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SimpleBench45.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzles13.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1447Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1461Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1455Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1268Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
ProofBench18.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math1429Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1448Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro84.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science1452Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1441Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1437Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1434Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites12571171MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components12461148MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev12101108MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3D12091132MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories12471155MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1161Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench design66.2%60.7%MiniMax M3
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysis76.2%64.6%MiniMax M3
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index60.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench82.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%69.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench78.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMCA33.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Surface Evolver Bench55.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text1433Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1433Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision1251Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English1443Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1466Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: German1428Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1380Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1373Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: French1444Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1433Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1426Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1423Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1443Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1446Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1419Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1403Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1263Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1259Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1197Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Document1435Not measuredOnly MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMiniMax M3Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M3 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMiniMax M3NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMiniMaxNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMay 31, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.50
Coding index57.865.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$0.56Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M3 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.8 for MiniMax M3, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick MiniMax M3 when what matters is LiveBench coding or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M3 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M3's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next