Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

MiniMax M2.7 leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 9.9, and MiniMax M2.7 costs 1.6x less per output token ($1.20 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
36.2
Overall
44.5
Output $/M
$1.20
12
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
23
vs boards won of 35 shared

MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: hard prompts or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Shared results
35
MiniMax M2.7 only
39
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
14
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 30.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: MiniMax M2.7 84.8% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 30.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.7 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.7BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Math11
Knowledge04
General217
All shared boards1223
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1399Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
AA Coding Index52.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)8.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
SciCode50.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)39.4%11.4%MiniMax M2.7
Terminal-Bench45.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
WeirdML37.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ALE-Bench599.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding14541438MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: software and IT14461442MiniMax M2.7
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1401Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.89.9MiniMax M2.7
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index15.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)27.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)28.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom84.8%54.1%MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond86.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.4%77.2%MiniMax M2.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.6%11.9%MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts14221428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14431442MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14411439MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AIME91.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
ProofBench3.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: math14211425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work14371419MiniMax M2.7
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro80.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14161444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14091431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government14031438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14071433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1242Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: UI components1207Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: game dev1209Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: data viz1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: 3D1194Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: SVG1137Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1136Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index217
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)79.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
IFBench75.7%56.5%MiniMax M2.7
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%63.7%MiniMax M2.7
ExploitBench13.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text14051420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following14051406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13541366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English14261429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English13821405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese14421463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German13981424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese12601385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13141394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14241452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14021428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian13831408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13871419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14121428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries14181419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13761392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13601368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 18, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window205K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.21
Output $/Mtok$1.20$1.90
Coding index36.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.64Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.7 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for a larger context window (262K against 205K tokens) and work measured by LMArena Text: hard prompts or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. MiniMax M2.7's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next