Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonar

MiniMax M2.7 leads Sonar on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.8 to 7.7, and Sonar costs 1.2x less per output token ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
Coding
36.2
Overall
22.8
Output $/M
$1.20
3
SonarPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

MiniMax M2.7 or Sonar: which to pick

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Sonar has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Sonar for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million).

Shared results
3
MiniMax M2.7 only
71
Sonar only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.7 36.2 from 3 benchmarks, Sonar not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 32.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): MiniMax M2.7 87.4% against Sonar 47.1%, 40.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.7 $1.20 against Sonar $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.7 takes 205K tokens, Sonar 127K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.7BarsSonarTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
LMArena WebDev1399Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
AA Coding Index52.6Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)11.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)8.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)48.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Sonar measured
SciCode50.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)39.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Terminal-Bench45.1%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
WeirdML37.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ALE-Bench599.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: coding1454Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1446Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1388Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1401Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.87.7MiniMax M2.7
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
AA Agentic Index15.3Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)27.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)28.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom84.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
GPQA Diamond86.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.4%47.1%MiniMax M2.7
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.6%4.9%MiniMax M2.7
LMArena Text: hard prompts1422Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: expert1443Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1441Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
AIME91.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ProofBench3.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: math1421Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1437Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
MMLU Pro80.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.9%Only Sonar measured
LMArena Text: science1416Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1409Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1403Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1407Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
Design Arena: websites1243Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: UI components1210Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: game dev1209Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: data viz1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: 3D1195Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1233Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: SVG1137Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1136Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)79.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
IFBench75.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
ExploitBench13.3%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text1405Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1354Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: English1426Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1382Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1442Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: German1398Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1260Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1314Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: French1424Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1402Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1383Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1387Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1412Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1376Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1360Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.7SonarLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.0009Fits in one request
Sonar$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.019Fits in one request
Sonar$0.053Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.7$0.072Exceeds the context window
Sonar$0.210Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.7 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.7 and Sonar
SpecificationMiniMax M2.7Perplexity Sonar
MakerMiniMaxPerplexity
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 18, 2026January 27, 2025
Context window205K127K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.20$1.00
Coding index36.2Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.64Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.7 better than Sonar for coding?

Only MiniMax M2.7 has a coding score, 36.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Sonar has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Sonar for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.00 vs $1.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Sonar?

MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Sonar costs $1.00 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.7 only.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or Sonar?

MiniMax M2.7, with 205K tokens against 127K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.7 vs Sonar comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. MiniMax M2.7's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Sonar's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next