Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Phi 4 vs Mistral Large 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Mistral Large 4Mistral AI
Coding
56.4
Overall
38.4
Output $/M
$4.18
31
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 29.9x less.

Shared results
31
Phi 4 only
14
Mistral Large 4 only
50
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Phi 4 not benchmarked, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 52.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Phi 4 13.8% against Mistral Large 4 98.3%, 84.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Phi 4 $0.14 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 29.9x apart.
Context window
Phi 4 takes 16K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryPhi 4BarsMistral Large 4Ties
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge04
General015
All shared boards031
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured27.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured78.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured45.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.3%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.1%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
SciCodeNot measured54.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured39.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1213.2Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding12311478Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: software and IT12281467Mistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1559Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.938.4Mistral Large 4
Epoch Capabilities Index130.5150.0Mistral Large 4
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench researchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured11.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom0.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
BALROG11.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.9%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured12.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)57.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%35.0%Mistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)56.1%88.1%Mistral Large 4
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12201444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: expert12031444Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12301442Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1288Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
AA Math Index18.0Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME13.8%98.3%Mistral Large 4
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured58.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
ProofBenchNot measured10.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MATH level 564.9%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math12461469Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: mathematical work12541462Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.4%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured20.0%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MMLU84.8%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science12061448Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12021433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: legal and government12411425Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: business and finance11991439Mistral Large 4
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1258Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1275Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1226Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1274Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1253Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1259Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1233Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1203Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LiveBench designNot measured65.6%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
IFBench23.5%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)0.0%81.3%Mistral Large 4
DTBenchNot measured88.2%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMCANot measured35.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)62.6%Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured28.1%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.8%Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text12171431Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: instruction following12011422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: creative writing11811363Mistral Large 4
LMArena VisionNot measured1272Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Text: English12311433Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: non-English11971422Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Chinese12121492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese11581415Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Korean1151Not measuredOnly Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: French12241492Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Spanish12341455Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: Russian12091417Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: multi-turn12061435Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: longer queries12171428Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: writing and language11981386Mistral Large 4
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11621378Mistral Large 4
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1283Only Mistral Large 4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1284Only Mistral Large 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
BenchmarkPhi 4Mistral Large 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request
Mistral Large 4$0.0034Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.081Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 4$0.314Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Phi 4 and Mistral Large 4
SpecificationMicrosoft Phi 4Mistral Large 4
MakerMicrosoftMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 10, 2025October 6, 2026
Context window16K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.07$1.36
Output $/Mtok$0.14$4.18
Coding indexNot benchmarked56.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Phi 4 better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?

Only Mistral Large 4 has a coding score, 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 29.9x less.

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Mistral Large 4?

Phi 4 costs $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Phi 4 or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Phi 4 vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Phi 4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next