Muse Wonder vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Muse Wonder leads MiMo-V2.6-Flash on coding, 71.9 to 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 71.4x less per output token ($0.28 vs $20.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 46 benchmarks have a result for both.
Muse Wonder or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick
Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 71.4x cheaper ($0.28 vs $20.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
- Shared results
- 46
- Muse Wonder only
- 14
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
- 20
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder scores 71.9 against 54.7.
3 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a AA Intelligence Index result, 37.9.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Muse Wonder has a Design Arena: websites result, 1362.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads, 64.9% against 54.8%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Muse Wonder $0.014, MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Muse Wonder 71.9 from 3 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 9.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Muse Wonder 49.5% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 24.2%, 33.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Muse Wonder $20.00 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 71.4x apart.
- Context window
- Muse Wonder takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Muse Wonder | Bars | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 10 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 7 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| General | 15 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 44 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index101
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1652 | 1634 | Muse Wonder |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 49.5% | 24.2% | Muse Wonder |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.1% | 79.0% | Muse Wonder |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 62.5% | 40.9% | Muse Wonder |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 66.9% | 47.7% | Muse Wonder |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.4% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 45.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 26.6% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 80.4% | 75.4% | Muse Wonder |
| SciCode | 60.3% | 51.3% | Muse Wonder |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1244.2 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1522 | 1499 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1515 | 1497 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1641 | 1648 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1694 | 1641 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1596 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 37.9 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 161.8 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1243 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 4.2% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 56.6% | 56.3% | Muse Wonder |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 36.3% | 28.5% | Muse Wonder |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 50.5% | 38.0% | Muse Wonder |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 23.8% | 13.3% | Muse Wonder |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 67.1% | 65.5% | Muse Wonder |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | 69.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 22.9% | 4.3% | Muse Wonder |
| Vals Science Index | 39.1% | 31.7% | Muse Wonder |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 7.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $9,432 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 27.5% | 21.6% | Muse Wonder |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 50.1% | 35.1% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1506 | 1475 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1513 | 1496 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1506 | 1493 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1276 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1283 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 84.0% | 63.0% | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: math | 1486 | 1476 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1514 | 1478 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 41.1% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1506 | 1462 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1512 | 1439 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1505 | 1441 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1483 | 1454 | Muse Wonder |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1362 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1379 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1376 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1317 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1427 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1371 | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index150
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 64.9% | 54.8% | Muse Wonder |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 70.2% | 67.6% | Muse Wonder |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.5% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.3% | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.7% | 74.3% | Muse Wonder |
| DTBench | 95.2% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMCA | 56.8% | Not measured | Only Muse Wonder measured |
| LMArena Text | 1502 | 1453 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1491 | 1452 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1491 | 1403 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1256 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1507 | 1476 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1492 | 1431 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1537 | 1509 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1458 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1359 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1425 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1523 | 1480 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1453 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1522 | 1409 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1455 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1510 | 1447 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1493 | 1459 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1496 | 1424 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1482 | 1415 | Muse Wonder |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1269 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1270 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1231 | Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Meta Muse Wonder | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 12, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $20.00 | $0.28 |
| Coding index | 71.9 | 54.7 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 3 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Muse Wonder better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?
Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 71.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.7 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for output tokens 71.4x cheaper ($0.28 vs $20.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
Which is cheaper, Muse Wonder or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Muse Wonder costs $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the Muse Wonder vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?
46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Wonder's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.