Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 8.5x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
9
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 12 shared

Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LiveBench reasoning or LiveBench design, where it leads.

Shared results
12
Muse Spark Open only
21
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
4
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: Muse Spark Open 36.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 4.0%, 32.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark OpenBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding20
Agentic work30
Reasoning11
Web design21
General11
All shared boards93
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench coding73.6%65.5%Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev1528Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode58.4%47.8%Muse Spark Open
ALE-Bench1590.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: React1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SWE-Bench Pro V295.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured26.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench research80.3%70.9%Muse Spark Open
LiveBench browser36.0%4.0%Muse Spark Open
LiveBench long agentic18.9%15.8%Muse Spark Open
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoning73.7%78.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%30.7%Muse Spark Open
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)28.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MathArena33.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
PRBench Legal59.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites13171173Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1149Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game dev12841110Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1155Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench design60.3%60.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Vals Index48.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysis60.2%64.6%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%69.0%Muse Spark Open
MultiChallenge74.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMetaNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.50
Coding index47.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it41
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LiveBench reasoning or LiveBench design, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark Open's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next