Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs 21.3x less per output token than Muse Spark Open ($0.20 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $4.25 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 21.3x cheaper.

Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 21.3x cheaper ($0.20 vs $4.25 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Spark Open has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Muse Spark Open $4.25 against Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.20 per million output tokens, 21.3x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark Open takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
LiveBench coding73.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev1528Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)6.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SciCode58.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-Bench1590.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: React1529Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1495Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
SWE-Bench Pro V295.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
LiveBench research80.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browser36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agentic18.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)53.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-Agents33.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
LiveBench reasoning73.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)28.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
MathArena33.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
PRBench Legal59.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
Design Arena: websites1317Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game dev1284Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench design60.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
Vals Index48.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysis60.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
MultiChallenge74.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.011Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.042Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark OpenNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
MakerMetaNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.20
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.20
Coding index47.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark Open better than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for output tokens 21.3x cheaper ($0.20 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Muse Spark Open has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI); Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next