LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Updated October 21, 2026. 59 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
59
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
28.6
Overall
21.4
Output $/M
$2.34
0
vs boards won of 59 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when output tokens cost 1.8x less.

Shared results
59
Muse Spark 1.3 only
33
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
6
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 28.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Muse Spark 1.3 74.4% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 31.2%, 43.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3BarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding70
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning80
Math40
Knowledge40
Web design70
General260
All shared boards590
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev16591400Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding Index75.8Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)27.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)72.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode59.7%44.8%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierSWE25.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-Bench1688.3621.9Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: coding15101464Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT15111463Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React16721388Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML16531410Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an image1640Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index48.121.4Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2146.8Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index55.5Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1297Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1295Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1217Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1241Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1244Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1048Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research68.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-Agents58.6%24.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%89.3%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%29.0%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%18.0%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts15031448Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert15191462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15001450Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams13301277Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: homework12961292Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%88.9%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.4%31.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: math14971453Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14911454Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena Text: science15071457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14931455Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14991441Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14901435Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websites13561191Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components13521163Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev13291141Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: data viz13431175Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D13591161Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories13531180Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG13001139Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art1280Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench design74.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index260
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%77.3%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench96.5%87.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA53.9%37.9%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text14901437Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14791424Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14621402Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision13081262Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: English14951443Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14811430Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese15321498Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German15131445Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese14701429Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean14901384Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French15111462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14961441Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14911430Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14901447Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871446Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14881441Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14701415Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14571399Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English12981268Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: Chinese13841314Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: reading text13191271Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: humor12931262Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12961260Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.39
Output $/Mtok$4.25$2.34
Coding index79.728.6
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when output tokens cost 1.8x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next