Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen-Plus

Qwen-Plus costs 5.4x less per output token than Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.78 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 26 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
26
Qwen-PlusQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.78
0
vs boards won of 26 shared

Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen-Plus: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.78 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
26
Muse Spark 1.3 only
66
Qwen-Plus only
2
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 45.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Muse Spark 1.3 99.2% against Qwen-Plus 17.8%, 81.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 5.4x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3BarsQwen-PlusTies
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math30
Knowledge40
General140
All shared boards260
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev1659Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index75.8Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)27.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)72.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
SciCode59.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierSWE25.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-Bench1688.3Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15101328Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT15111343Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React1672Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1653Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1640Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index48.1Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index55.5Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1297Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1295Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1216Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1241Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1220Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1076Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research68.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
APEX-Agents58.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15031317Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert15191328Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15001333Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1330Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%17.8%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured65.3%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14971326Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14911332Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
LMArena Text: science15071352Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14931350Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14991349Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14901303Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites1356Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1350Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1328Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1344Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1358Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1352Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1301Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1280Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench design74.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
DTBench96.5%81.1%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA53.9%24.0%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text14901326Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14791303Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14621292Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14951339Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14811310Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese15321347Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German1513Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese14701251Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean1490Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1511Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1496Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14911323Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish1490Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871336Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14881324Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14701296Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14571270Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1384Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1319Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1293Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen-PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.015Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.060Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen-Plus
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3Qwen-Plus
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.26
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.78
Coding index57.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen-Plus for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.78 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen-Plus?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen-Plus?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen-Plus comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Qwen-Plus's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next