Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Phi 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
33
Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

Decision reading

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 30.4x less.

Shared results
33
Muse Spark 1.3 only
59
Phi 4 only
12
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks, Phi 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 55.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Muse Spark 1.3 99.2% against Phi 4 13.8%, 85.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 against Phi 4 $0.14 per million output tokens, 30.4x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1.05M tokens, Phi 4 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.3BarsPhi 4Ties
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math30
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
LiveBench coding90.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev1659Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index75.8Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)10.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)27.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)43.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)72.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.1%Only Phi 4 measured
SciCode59.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Phi 4 measured
FrontierSWE25.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-Bench1688.3Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15101231Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT15111228Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React1672Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1653Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1640Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index48.15.9Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index157.2130.5Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
AA Agentic Index55.5Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1297Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1295Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1218Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1241Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1244Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1044Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research68.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browser80.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agentic40.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)36.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)62.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured0.0%Only Phi 4 measured
APEX-Agents58.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
BALROGNot measured11.6%Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
LiveBench reasoning89.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%57.5%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%3.8%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured56.1%Only Phi 4 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzles25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15031220Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert15191203Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15001230Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1330Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured18.0Only Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.0%Only Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME99.2%13.8%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured64.9%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math14971246Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14911254Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.4%Only Phi 4 measured
MMLUNot measured84.8%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science15071206Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14931202Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14991241Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14901199Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
Design Arena: websites1356Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1352Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1329Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1343Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1359Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1353Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1301Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1280Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench design74.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBenchNot measured23.5%Only Phi 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.0%0.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMCA53.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.6%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text14901217Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14791201Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14621181Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision1308Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14951231Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14811197Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese15321212Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German15131222Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese14701158Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean14901151Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French15111224Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14961234Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14911209Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish1490Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14871206Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14881217Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14701198Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14571162Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English1298Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1384Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1319Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1293Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Phi 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.3 and Phi 4
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.3Microsoft Phi 4
MakerMetaMicrosoft
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026January 10, 2025
Context window1.05M16K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.07
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.14
Coding index57.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it40
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Phi 4 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Phi 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Phi 4 has the edge where output tokens cost 30.4x less.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Phi 4?

Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Phi 4 costs $0.07 and $0.14. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Phi 4?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.3 vs Phi 4 comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Phi 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next