Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 37.9 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 3.5x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.28 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
54.7
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$0.28
30
vs boards won of 30 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which to pick

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.28 per million).

Shared results
30
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
21
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
36
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 54.7 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 50.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 1053 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1425, 62.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards030
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1634Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
AA Coding Index5.4Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured51.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.2Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding11951499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT11951497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1648Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1641Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1596Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.937.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert11441496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1276Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured63.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821439MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government12061441MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance11661454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
IFBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%74.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMCA5.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following11591452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing11541403MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1256Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: English12181476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English11481431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese11511509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German11441458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese10611359MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Korean10531425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French11781480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish11691453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian11581409MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1455Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries11811459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language11621424MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1269Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1231Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerMeta LlamaXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024September 21, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.14
Output $/Mtok$0.08$0.28
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.7
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash has a coding score, 54.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.28 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next