Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 53.1x less per output token ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 53.1x cheaper ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
36
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
15
Muse Spark 1.3 only
56
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 67.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 1.7% against Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%, 97.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 53.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge04
General019
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding Index5.475.8Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding11951510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT11951511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.948.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert11441519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government12061499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance11661490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1356Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1349Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1328Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1343Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1358Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1352Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index019
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%83.0%Muse Spark 1.3
DTBench50.9%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA5.4%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following11591479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing11541462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English12181495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English11481481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese11511532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German11441513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese10611470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean10531490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French11781511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish11691496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian11581491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries11811488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language11621470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024September 2, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.08$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 53.1x cheaper ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next