Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 48.1 to 6.6, and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 7.6x less per output token ($0.56 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.56
0
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
57.4
Overall
68.6
Output $/M
$4.25
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 7.6x cheaper ($0.56 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
34
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct only
13
Muse Spark 1.3 only
58
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.3 57.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 58.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 3.6% against Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%, 95.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.6x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 70B InstructBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math03
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1659Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured10.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured43.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured59.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
WeirdML9.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1688.3Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding12601510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT12601511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1672Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1653Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1640Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.648.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index125.9157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1218Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1219Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1062Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured80.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
BALROG27.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany6.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured89.7%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%94.1%Muse Spark 1.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)44.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured37.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured25.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12411503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert12091519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12611500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1330Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Math Index4.0Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME3.6%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.4%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
MATH level 536.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12521497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work12531491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MMLU80.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12761507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12571493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government12831499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance12351490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1356Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1349Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1328Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1343Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1358Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1352Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured74.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.6%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
IFBench34.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.0%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
DTBench60.0%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA14.8%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text12611490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following12311479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing12321462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena VisionNot measured1308Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: English12941495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English12191481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese12151532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German12221513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese11321470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean11401490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French12621511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish12531496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian12341491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1490Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12561487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries12411488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language12361470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12301457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1298Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1384Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1319Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024September 2, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.56$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.56$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.3 has a coding score, 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 7.6x cheaper ($0.56 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next