Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads Kimi K2 Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 22.0, at about the same output price ($2.40 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
1
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.40
16
vs boards won of 17 shared

Kimi K2 Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
17
Kimi K2 Thinking only
17
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
54
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 10.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Kimi K2 Thinking 63.1% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 86.0%, 22.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.40 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 ThinkingBarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work10
Reasoning03
Knowledge04
Web design01
General02
All shared boards116
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
SWE-bench Verified63.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)63.1%86.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.2%69.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SciCodeNot measured40.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%36.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Terminal-Bench35.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
WeirdML42.8%43.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra
ALE-Bench597.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1467Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.022.9Nemotron 3 Ultra
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8146.0Nemotron 3 Ultra
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%83.3%Kimi K2 Thinking
APEX-AgentsNot measured22.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
METR time horizons59.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA Diamond78.5%86.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.8%28.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
AIME85.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index94.7Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProofBenchNot measured2.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MathArena15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU Pro81.1%85.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.2%82.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
CaseLaw (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%65.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%73.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra
MedQA (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1453Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
PRBench Finance43.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
PRBench Legal40.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites11131145Nemotron 3 Ultra
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1135Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1138Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1142Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1146Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1069Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1100Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
IFBench68.1%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%79.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMCANot measured36.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CL-bench17.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1474Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1417Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MultiChallenge55.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingNemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0018Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.037Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.144Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 Thinking and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 ThinkingNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerMoonshot AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025June 4, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.60
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.40
Coding indexNot benchmarked30.0
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved task$0.61Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Only Nemotron 3 Ultra has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.60 and $2.40. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Kimi K2 Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next