Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus leads Mercury 2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 27.0 to 10.8, and Mercury 2 costs 2.6x less per output token ($0.75 vs $1.95 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 39 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
1
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen
Coding
44.1
Overall
56.2
Output $/M
$1.95
38
vs boards won of 39 shared

Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 Plus: which to pick

Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a coding score, 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.95 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Shared results
39
Mercury 2 only
3
Qwen3.6 Plus only
44
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2 not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 Plus 44.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 26.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Mercury 2 1160 against Qwen3.6 Plus 1454, 49.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2 $0.75 against Qwen3.6 Plus $1.95 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2 takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.6 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2BarsQwen3.6 PlusTies
Coding17
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Knowledge03
Web design08
General013
All shared boards138
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index17
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev11711461Qwen3.6 Plus
AA Coding Index31.154.5Qwen3.6 Plus
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured73.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.6%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured11.1%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SciCode37.7%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%43.9%Qwen3.6 Plus
WeirdML43.2%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench785.6670.1Mercury 2
LMArena Text: coding13901467Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT13851462Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: React11601454Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: HTML11991463Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1472Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.827.0Qwen3.6 Plus
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.3Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index1.6Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured32.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
τ²-Bench Telecom70.8%97.7%Qwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,115Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%88.2%Qwen3.6 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%27.8%Qwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.4%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13621448Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: expert13581454Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13741455Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
AIMENot measured94.6%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured38.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1449Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1448Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
MMLU ProNot measured87.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured36.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured44.1%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: science13431439Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13631442Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: business and finance13491430Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites10361243Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: UI components9981233Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: game dev9851211Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: data viz10091228Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: 3D9831202Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: all code categories10221236Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: SVG9981161Qwen3.6 Plus
Design Arena: ASCII art9881113Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured44.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured77.0%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured51.5%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
IFBench69.8%75.2%Qwen3.6 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.7%78.3%Qwen3.6 Plus
DTBenchNot measured81.9%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMCANot measured33.1%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
CL-benchNot measured20.3%Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text13541436Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following13281424Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing12861404Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: English13781445Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English13301424Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14141477Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1451Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1390Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1379Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1432Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: Russian13041434Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1433Only Qwen3.6 Plus measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13571438Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries13291439Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language13001418Qwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13141402Qwen3.6 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
BenchmarkMercury 2Qwen3.6 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.0013Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.022Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 Plus$0.085Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2 and Qwen3.6 Plus
SpecificationInception Mercury 2Qwen3.6 Plus
MakerInceptionQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 4, 2026April 2, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.325
Output $/Mtok$0.75$1.95
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.1
Independent measurements behind it13
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.19
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Qwen3.6 Plus for coding?

Only Qwen3.6 Plus has a coding score, 44.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mercury 2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.95 per million) and work measured by ALE-Bench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Mercury 2 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.325 and $1.95. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 Plus only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2 or Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.6 Plus comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mercury 2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.6 Plus's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next